Regarding dhanya's
articles on
women who write poetry!
- Latha Ramakrishnan
-
As
I am not a regular visitor to browsing-centres and also as most of these
centres do not have tamil fonts downloaded i can type this letter
not in tamil, much as i wish to do so, but only in English. Regarding Dhanya's
observations on issues pertaining to women who write poetry she is
correct in pointing out that there have been women writing in the 80s too
but without trying to highlight the fact that they are women writing poetry.
These women were writing on various issues in their own way. Afterall,
no one can dictate to a poet as to what they shoud write. Whatever
affects a poet he or she gives vent to it in his or her poetry. But sadly,
this basic idea of poetry is overlooked and all the limelight is
focussed on only a select few women who write poetry. And, more often
than not their writings are considered above criticism and any obervation
on these writings are branded male-chauvenistic and highhanded. It is not
correct to say that pop-magazines and small-magazines are decrying
them. For, it is the small-magazine circle which has always stood for them
by publishing their poems and by writing about them continuously. Pop-magazines
are known to decry the initiatives of small-magazines for reasons
too well known. The fact is that the small magazines hailed these
select few as the harbingers of women-writing in tamil which is not
all that true. As said earlier, women writing poetry is not all that
new.
And, mr.rajamarthandan's list, like any
other list highlights some women who write poetry and half-heartedly mentions
several others belonging to Tamilnadu. These things happen always. When
the fact being that the writers of small-magazines strive and go on working
against all odds, it is wrong to say that women writing poetry face
undue suppression. On the other hand as things stand today
it is comparitively easier for women in this field to gain attention and
recognition. More so, when, of the ten or so only four are five are
oft-quoted or highlighted. I write under the pseudonym 'rishi' and my views,
being in the field can be wantonly misinterpreted as jealousy or
some such thing but i care a damn. Certain things have to be said.
Taken out of context any line can sound schoolmasterish. But as a poet
committed to the cause of small magazines and poetry and one who has never
tried to grab any limelight and one who has never resorted to pronouncing
sweeping statements can't mr.brammarajan write his views on the poetry
of any woman? For that matter any discerning reader has the freedom to
air his or her views. That doesn't make one a fascist or fundementalist.
But that is exactly how such reviewers are projected paired alongwith
those who decry women maliciously and with ulterior motives.
In fact i feel that the whole issue came to be because there were
some who kept on quoting these 'select few' hailing them as penning
the ultimate poetry. So much eulogy is bound to bring in adverse comments.
And, all the adverse comments are not unethical or oppressive. It
is argued that centuries after centuries women who took to writing were
suppressed. May be true, but then history is twofold-the history of the
past and the history of the present. The past injustices meted to women
in the field of literature are 'things of the past.'. Today , being ten
against hundred ( and, four or five being the select few among the ten)
the survival and the limelight are easier to reach for women than
for men who write good poetry. Before concluding, it should be stated that
mr.brammarajan always maintains that there is something called women-poetry
and it was he who alongwith his friend Sivakumar ,translator and
co-author of meetshi, the prestigious small magazine of the yesteryears
convened a two-day symposium for women in the field of literature. And,
i didn't take part in it saying that such bracketing as women-writers
is unnnecessary and that it only helps to satisfy the ego of some men.
And i sincerely feel that such exclusive status does help some women in
gaining attention and recognition. And this exclusive status has
driven some women who are involved in creative writing to voice those
'dry slogans such as men are evil forces and mothers are the
saviours of the world and that all men are aggressors man's
body is a dead thing while the woman's can create magic etc, etc- slogans
that even the dry-leftists have long discarded. Today's world and its power-system
exploit and oppress men also in numerous ways. I remember the words of
ms.srilatha swaminathan an activist whom i chanced to meet when i
participated in an All-India Women's Conference held in Patna in the 90s(
i was invited to participate as an observer and a translator) who said
that this divide between men and women was used by the landlords to exploit
the working class all the more. Lot more to say on this issue. Still, i
stop for the time-being.
ramakrishnanlatha@yahoo.com |
|