BEING A PART-TIME
AGENT OF
MALE CHAUVENISM IS
BETTER
THAN BEING A FULL-TIME
PSEUDO-FEMINIST!
Latha Ramakrishnan
'Whatever
you see, you only see what you want to see. Whatever you hear, you only
hear what you want to hear.' -This is how I interpret Mr.NadchaththiranChevinthianne's
, observation that my voice is ultra-conservative. While calling
my language- prosaic and of the old colonial English, he still makes use
ofmost of my letter to fill his rejoinder the remaining part
of which is filled up by datas! So much so, his letter has no room
for his own English to compare and evaluate! Anyhow, I should
thank him for giving my exact lines in his letter thereby giving the readers
a chance to judge for themselves the truth and validityor otherwise of
what I,ve said. Who ever said that women don't suffer? We are talking of
women writing poetry, and that too in small magazines, in particular. What
Ms.Dhanya has said it is for her to clarify. Why should Mr.Chevinthianne
butt in and speak on her behalf?
In small magazine circle,
as things stand today, women, especially a select few are projected in
various ways as the ultimate poets or the harbingers of feminist poetry.
This glorification with no compare and contrast study or critical
evaluation of their poetry understandably brings in adverse criticism
and also an impartial critical evaluation of their poetry is very rarely
coming forth and even if it does it is nipped in the bud with
such clichés as fundementalism , fascism etc. Magazines vie with
one another to have the interviews of these women writing poetry
in their pages, but, the upcoming, promising poets of the opposite sex
and their struggles in the literary field and in the social and psychological
arena of survival are not given due attemtion or coverage. And, these select
few women who write poetryfor whom the response is overwhelming to the
point of keeping them on a pedastal(today when even actresses come
out with specs and sans make-up and don'thesitate to disclose their date-of-birth
Mr.Annakannan of Amudhasurabi in his interview of Ms.Malathy
Maithri had exclaimed that the poet's first collection of poems
has the year of her birth in block letters in the very first
page which is very revolutionary!) , , and their poetry above criticism,
the brickbats are but very few, that too from expected circles. I am not
saying that they are not writing good poetry but I object to their being
glorified as the ultimate poets and the pioneers of women poetry. And,
also I object to the constant sidelining of other poets, mainly their
contemporaries of the opposite sex, who pen real good poems but don't get
get even a flicker of the limelight. I know very well the difference
between women writing and feminist writing and I don't have to be taught
by the all-knowing Mr.Chevinthianne who knows clitoris, g-spot and what
not! Let me remind him that a male doctor knows about them better than
many a female. Be it eve-teasing,nay, torturing or rape and gang-rape,
the men close to the victim suffer greater stress than may
be even a woman who is a stranger to the girlconcerned, or, who reads about
the gruesome happening in a newspaper.Take the case of the hostage
crisis? What for the men are being held as captives? For their being men?
Or, for their not being women? This is what I mean when I say that the
power system of today oppress the men also in numerous ways.A man with
real progressive outlook would never use such terms as Concubine. But,
Mr.Chevinthianne uses. And, his implications are very clear. Being away
fromboth Srilanka and India he can afford to use such phrases as concubine-keeper
and career-womanizer without any second thought about the possiblerepercussions
they would have back home and down here. Will a woman President convert
America from being malignant to being benign? I am forwarding here
the full text of Mr.Brammarajan's critical evaluation of Kutti Revathy's
second collection "Mulaigal". He gives an open statement that his
views bear no moralisticconnotations. To my knowledge his critical evaluations
would always be ably substantiated(we may agree with it or not, that is
a different issue) and he wouldnever indulge in vicious, personal
attack. And, we can just take them as one of the many view-points
and leave it at that instead of attributing ulteriormotives.( But, what
I see as the politics of it is that when it comes to ms.malathy maithri
why Kalachuvadu is not coming forth with such critical evaluation?)
There was another critical evaluation of the said poem-collection of Ms.Kutti
Revathi by mr.Rani-thilak , another upcoming poet. But, sadly by the time
an interview of his appears he would well be in his forties or even
fifties. How maliciously Mr.Nadchaththiran Chevinthianne makes much ado
about my usage of 'may be'. May be I am a woman- may be I am a eunach.
It has no relevance to the issue at hand. But, decrying the usage
of 'may be' in one breath the next instant he says' Anuradha Ramanan
or even Latha Ramakrishnan may well fit into the first category, that of
women who do not challenge male-chauvenism.Here, he uses the term
'even' in the same meaning as 'may be'. It is very clear that he has not
read my pieces. Much as I hate to blow my own trumpet I am forced to do
so, to makethis friend see reason. Here is my poem which was published
in the 1997 Dhinamani Kadhir Special Issue on Literature. It
is a widely read magazine but therewas not a word of protest against
it. So, please think twice before claiming that Srilanka including its
Tamil regions is more modernized than TamilNadu. Suchcomparisons and sweeping
statements are unwarranted. When Anuradha Ramanan came into the field she
was just 26, left with her two girl children coming from amiddle
class family and with just an s.s.l.c or so to her credit she
had her share of struggles. And when she was writing akind of memoirs there
was heavythreat from a politically strong woman social -worker. And, what
a great hue and cry her prize winning short-story 'Sirai' caused!
It was about a young wifeof an orthodox Brahmin raped and left in
the lurch by the husband. As a punishment to the wrong-doer she goes and
stays in the house of the rapist. He repentand when he dies she, seeing
in him a better human being than her husband refuses to go back to
her husband even when the latter comes to take her withhim. At that time
also I wrote an article in "Kanaiyazhi' to the effect that it was wrong
on the part of the author to have overlooked the fact that the husband
was also a victim of the social set-up and have turned a rapist,
a hero.With this piece of information I'm sure Mr.Chevinthianne will
have no hesitation in calling me a full-time agent of male-chauvenism!
But, seriously speaking, I'm giving this piece of information to drive
home the point that writers like Anuradha Ramanan cannot be waved away
just like that as pro-men. It is just that they don't believe in the kind
of feminism which thrive on decrying the whole lot of men as oppressors
and fundamentalists. And, Ms.Sivasankari's very first short-story 'Avargal
Paesattum" dealt with the horrible way a woman with no issues is treated
in
social functions and ceremonies.What about Vaasanthi, Usha Subramanian,
Thilagavathi, Sivagami, Bama, to name a few? But, Mr.Nadchaththiran can
give the name of Ambai alone. Though I have great respect for her writings
still I can't but say that a good number of her writings do sound like
aesthetically articulated slogans. All the same, in her detailed interview
in "Panikkudam" authoured by Ms.Kutti Revathi Ms.Ambai
has this to say:-
And, I'm forwarding Ms.Bama's
and Ms.Sivagami's observations on women writing poetry of the body and
its sexuality.( courtesy; 'Pudhiya Puthagam Paesudhu' and Theera Nadhi,
respectively). Just because they opine so is it right to call them advocates
of male-chauvenism? Mr.Nadchaththiran has a lot to ponder over. And, in
the field of Poetry has he ever cared to know who are all the other women
writing and how long they have been in the field and what at all theywrite?
Vathsala, Vaigaichelvi Renganayaki, Ilampirai, Kanimozhi , Ira.Meenakshi,
Thirisadai, Vennila, Mu.Sathya , Sathara Malathy (In fact Sathara is the
name of the place where she lives but then for many the name
Malathy stands for Malathy Maithri), Thamizhachi, Azhagu Nila and many
more. And, many of them are there in the field for long. But, in
one of the recent issues of Pennae Nee, Ms.Kutti Revathi says 'first I
was alone facing the assaults and brickbats -now there are Salma, Uma Maheswari
and others----( the pages enclosed). But, Salma and Uma Maheswari have
come into the field long before Ms. Revathi and how happy I felt when I
came to know from her Ms.Salma's interview in Anandha Vikatan that she
was the same Rajathi penning such poignant poems in "Nigazh' and
Suttum Vizhich chudar' and who just disappeared from the scene one
fine day, for it lent strength to my conviction that the creative urge
in a person can never be suppressed or strangulated. Is it not tampering
with facts? When they find fault with the male poets for not including
their names in the pages of history that they pen in terms of the growth
and evolution of neo-Tamil poetry they should atleast have the courtesy
to mention the names of their contemporaries and predecessors , belonging
to their sex. But, they make it a point to mouth such names as Sylvia Plath,
Kamala Das, Emily Dickenson, Akhmatova (and their list is pathetically
short) and not a name from the Tamil land, for, then their claim that feminist
writing in Poetry has begun with their advent. And, this is a blatant lie,
to say the least. And, the fact being that almost all the menfolk of the
small magazine circle stood and stand by these women whenever they face
the wrath of the vested interests ,many of these women poets make it a
point to decry men as a whole. And much of the protest came
as a result of the ongoing campaign that this alone is poetry and
women writing about their body alone are real poets and all the others
are hypocrites. There is no need for me to prove my credentials toMr.Nadchaththiran
Chevinthianne. But, still I've written such a detailed letter to make him
realize that facts are not to be over-simplified or tampered with. At this
junture I want to refute the observation of some people like
Poet Rajamarthandan that women began to pen poetry here, with the poems
of the Srilankan women poets(Tamil) giving the required impetus. We have
our own inner compusions and urge to turn us into poets, please. Before
concluding, I would like to point out- please , let not Mr.Nadchaththiran
Chevvinthianne think that I am saying this to be in his good books- I,ve
never cared to be in the good books of any- -thatMs.Thilagabama's
condemnation of the poems in the recent issue of Kalachuvadu is uncalled
for. She is decrying almost all the sensitive poets of TamilNadu right
from Kalapriya to Shankararamasubramanian.And, hers is indeed
the tone of a moralist. Her views that have appeared in Pennae Nee did
not confine themselves to the poems alone .( the page enclosed).
And, what does she mean by that oft-repeated 'Ull mana Vakkaram'? Day in
and day out we come across so many actual 'vakkarams' around us. Sukumaran's
poem which she has decried is in fact a poignant piece dealing
with a man's anguish in having to copulate with an unwilling spouse. Sugirtharani's
poems have powerful similes and images such as-----'pasiya
kattraazhai kooraai/virigindrana en viralgal-'koor theetiyakalaal/narukkappatta
thoppull kodi poel/thuruthik kondirukkiradhu/nam udhadugalukkidaiyil muththam'------And,
the very first line of her very first poem " Mayirgal siraikkaadha en nirvaanam/azhikkappaadha
kaadugalaip poela/ gambeeram veesugiradhu', to my readerly text is
in fact a rebellious voice of protest against the gigantic hoardings and
advertisements which glare at you from high above even in busy junctions
and at traffic signals, showing young women with their arms lifted uu so
showing their their thoroughly shaven, shining armpits with jingles
underneath to the effect that men want silk-skinned females. And, when
the institution of marriage plays havoc in many a woman's lives by which
a woman has to sleep with a man who is a hundred percent stranger to her
and whose image of an ideal wife is built by these hoardings and such other
things the physical andpsychological trauma of it all find
a release in the lines of verses thus. And, I need not tell that the poems
of Ms.Sugirtharani is not to be taken as her own personal experience.
Writer Jeyaprakasam has observed in one of her recent interviews that any
irrelevant description is vulgar and obscene. Ofcourse, he was referring
to Mr.J.P.Chanakya's short-story Aangal Padithurai. While his observation
is sound, even here we can say that irrelevance is a highly relative term.
If many a reader get a 'readerly text' which is irrelevant, having pseudo-value,
then the text and such texts will not stand the test of time.Therefore,
without even giving a chance but trying to nip in the bud itself such approaches
in style and content is not good for the multi-dimensional growth
of literature. At the same time Mr.Perumal Murugan's display of thefoul
saying which he had come across on the inside walls of a public lavotary
serves no purpose. The man who had written it there obviously didn't want
to getidentified. When that being the case why lend some
importance to it?
ramakrishnanlatha@yahoo.com |
|