Trends in
SriLankan Thamil literature!
by K.S. Sivakumaran
One
of the first books in Thamil on the History of Thamil Literature in general
written in classifying developments under periods (from Sangam Era - B.C.
3rd to A.D. 3rd Century and up to the earliest 20th century) was by a Lankan
professor, the late V. Chelvanayagam (father of academic Chelva Kanaganayagam
of Toronto University in Canada .However, the literary contributions by
Lankans were not fully discussed except in passing references. Later, the
late K. Kailasapathy and the living K. Sivathamby emerged as Thamil intellectuals
in the field of the arts and literature. They were students of the late
professors at Peradeniya - Kanapathipillai, Chelvanayagam, Sathasivam and
Vithiananthan.
Although
the academia and regular faithfuls call Kailasapathy and Sivathamby as
literary critics, I am not too sure about that, because what they actually
wrote as works of solid literary criticism is meagre. But what they wrote
outside the field is of tremendous importance.They were giants as literary
theorists and historians of Lankan Thamil literature.They were Marxist
critics and therefore their perception was bent on those lines. So one
may not readily accept their dismissal and ignorance of non-marxist writing.
Because even non-marxist writing deserve adequate evaluation. That is what
people like Raymond Williams, Arnold Kettle and other Marxist critics in
the west did.
They evaluated even Jane
Austen purely with literary yardsticks. But the Lankan Thamil Marxist critics
were not fair by other important writers like Mahakavi, Thalayasingam and
S. Ponnuthurai or the writers from the east and hill country in Sri Lanka.
However, Kailasapathy and Sivathamby brought in a scientific base to understand
literature in a systematic manner.
They emphasized social
consciousness and regional (meaning a Sri Lankan perspective) flavour in
the Marxian ideology that prevailed in the 1960s and 1970s. But after the
1980s with the emergence of self-guarded nationalism among the Thamilians
immediately after the horrible July 1983 killings, the accent on Marxism
had to naturally give way to the portrayal of real human condition prevailing
in the north, east, the hill country and Colombo.
At
the same time, Kailasapathy and Sivathamby revolutionized the critical
thinking among the academic segment in Taminadu in India. So their contribution
towards literary studies based on contemporary approaches in a larger arena
is indeed noteworthy. I shall write separately on Kailasapthy's significance
not only on Lankan Thamil literature and the intellectual climate, but
also in the overall study of Literature in Thamil and Sivathamby's importance
at present in subsequent columns.For the present, let me glean some points
from a particular work by K. Sivathamby. Like Kailasapathy, Sivathamby
has written in both Thamil and English. Elucidating the cultural aspects
of the Thamilians, in particular the Lankan breeds. The book referred to
is in Thamil and is called 'Eelathil Thamil Ilakkiyam' (Thamil Literature
in Sri Lanka). I am particularly interested in quoting the factors that
converged towards literary criticism. The list follows:
1. There has been concern
to locate literature in the context of Lankan social and cultural climate
ever since literary attempts were made by Lankans with enthusiasm and when
specific works were produced.
2. There were opportunities
for Lankan Thamil literature students to know and understand the indigenous
regional and outside traditions and to adapt them suitably for understanding
rather than learning more about the Thamil Literature in India.
3. The role the Lankan
universities played towards understanding literature.
4. The mutual and conducive
relationship and benefits between the creative writers and the critics
to learn from each other. Sivathamby also identifies those who gain importance
in the tradition of Lankan Literary Criticism.
They are: 1. Lankan Literary
Commentators 2. Generation of important teachers 3. Belle-Lettrists linked
with the media 4. Creative writers belonging to the 'Maru Malarchi' group
(the Renaissance group) who had an acumen for literary criticism and social
consciousness. 5. The pioneers of 'Progressive' Literature 6. The Progressive
Critics of an academic background 7. Proponents and opponents among critically
bent creative writers in response to the impact of 'progressive' writing
8. Critics engaged in research in literary criticism as a result of academic
training. (More on Trends in Lankan Thamil Literature in subsequent columns).
kssivan1@juno.com
courtesy: Daily News (Sri
Lanka) |